From the May 2008 Watchdog Report
Sorting
Out Nonprofit Pairs
Donors are often confused by nonprofit pairs. These
are related charities whose names often look very similar but that
are legally separate organizations. Some examples of nonprofit pairs
are Greenpeace and Greenpeace Fund; Common Cause
and Common Cause Education Fund; Human Rights Campaign
and Human Rights Campaign Foundation, just to name a few.
Such groups often share employees and other resources - in some
cases the same office space and address. Donors are often confused
about the differences between related charities and why it matters
which charity they donate to.
The types of activities in which a charity engages
will often determine how it must be organized under the tax code,
its level of transparency and disclosure requirements to the public,
and its tax-deductibility status. Some nonprofits may need to form
legally separate entities with different tax designations to comply
with IRS rules. For example, a 501(c)3 public charity that is typically
eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions may form a related
501(c)4 social welfare nonprofit for purposes of conducting lobbying
or some political activity. 501(c)3 organizations risk losing their
tax-deductible status if they engage in too much lobbying or in
any politics. Conversely, a 501(c)4 organization may form a 501(c)3
organization so that future donations it receives to fund, say,
a research or education program, would be tax-deductible.
Many times the grades of two related charities may
be vastly different based on how they raise and spend donor dollars.
501(c)4 organizations, for example, may trend toward higher overall
fundraising ratios since they more frequently incur the cost to
obtain first-time donors, and because donations to such groups are
not tax-deductible. However, related charities will often conduct
financial transactions between them, so donors may want to consider
the grades of both organizations before donating to either group.
For instance, a highly inefficient charity may incur high fundraising
costs, then grant large sums of money to its related group. This
can make the charity receiving the funds appear to be operating
very efficiently since it looks to be raising significant contributions
with little or no fundraising costs. AIP often refers to the combined
audited financial statements of related charities and makes adjustments
for certain transactions between related groups in order to provide
donors with a clearer picture of how efficiently a charity is using
its donations. However, the grades of related groups can still vary
widely if one group is operating more efficiently than the other
even after adjustments for financial transactions between the groups
are made.
While some donors may think of the related entities
of a charity as being the same group, related organizations are
legally separate and donors must therefore write their donation
check to a specific charity rather than to a combined pair of related
organizations. Nonprofit pairs often have very similar names that
differ only in suffix: Foundation, Education Fund, Action League,
Trust, etc. While related charities may share resources, they often
conduct very different programs that serve different purposes, such
as research versus lobbying, within the combined pair's overall
mission. Donors should always check a charity's full name to ensure
that their donations are being directed to the types of activities
they are intending to support. Generally, donations to 501(c)3 public
charities are tax-deductible, while donations to 501(c)4 social
welfare nonprofits are not. (The latter are indicated in the Guide
with "nt" next to their names.) Since there are some exceptions,
before giving, donors should check with the charity or the IRS to
verify a charity's tax-deductibility status.
|