In the News
From advice on giving in a crisis to expert analysis on complex charity finances, CharityWatch is a valuable resource for the media and general public alike. Here is a sampling of our many contributions to news stories.
"'Scammers are particularly active during a crisis like this because it's easy to play into people's emotions and create a sense of urgency that prevents the average person from asking too many questions before donating,' Styron said."
"'If one charity can vaccinate 10 people with your donation while another charity can only vaccinate two, it's easy to understand how taking a little extra time to do your research before giving will allow you to maximize your impact,' said Laurie Styron, executive director of CharityWatch."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, warning donors to do their research before giving in a crisis in order to avoid scams and maximize the impact of their donations.
"'If you really, really want to help just take an extra 10 or 20 minutes and do a little bit of research to make sure whatever you want to give whether that's $10 or $2,000, if you just take a little extra time you can make sure the donation you give is going to have some kind of an impact.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, speaking with reporter Patrick Nelson of KOAA News5 Colorado (E.W. Scripps) on the importance of doing research before donating in the wake of a tragedy.
NBC News Southern Colorado, 05/10/2021
"'To maintain public trust, it is vital that leaders not only avoid any impropriety in practice, but also avoid the appearance of it,' Styron said. 'In other words, even if the consultant or vendor hired is the best one for the job, if that vendor has a personal relationship with the leader who hired them, additional steps should be taken to prove to the public that this arrangement is in the best interest of the charity and was made at arm's length.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, commenting generally on the importance of avoiding nepotism in the selection of charity vendors.
The Daily Caller, 05/06/2021
"Laurie Styron, executive director at the philanthropy watchdog group CharityWatch, told the Daily Beast that Americans have historically donated 3 percent of their annual income to charity. But even as the affluent's share of wealth grows, the poor and middle classes give a higher percentage of their income on average, though the wealthy may not be impacted by the loss of resources in any tangible way."
"'I think this is why the general public is becoming less impressed with these types of giving pledges,' Styron said. '[They] have become the public's baseline expectation of the wealthy, as opposed to being thought of as acts worthy of undying gratitude and praise.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, contributes her thoughts on public reaction to giving pledges announced by wealthy donors.
The Daily Beast, 04/15/2021
"Allowing billionaires to skip out on their taxes or pay less through legal tactics like subsidies, loopholes, or rare legal arrangements like NPAs has clear and direct consequences, said Laurie Styron, executive director of CharityWatch. 'We lose the collective ability to manage our society's resources equitably,' she explained. 'Even if all of these resources were to hypothetically be shifted from tax payments to philanthropic gifts, the public still loses out for a few reasons.'"
"For one, Styron said, wealthy philanthropists often make their most significant gifts late in life. The taxes they might have paid throughout their careers are substituted with lump-sum gifts targeted at solving problems years later, rather than preventing them along the way. For another, they tend to favor a few charities working on pet causes important to them. 'The public loses the power to participate in the decision-making process of how, where, and in what amounts those resources should be distributed,' Styron said. 'These decisions are instead being made by one wealthy person or a handful of people working for that person's foundation.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, commenting on the alleged tax evasion scandal involving billionaire philanthropist Robert F. Smith.
The Daily Beast, 03/22/2021
"'Charities could certainly be part of an incestuous collection of legal entities that make it very difficult to follow the money,' said Laurie Styron, executive director of Charity Watch [sic]. If the DOJ's lawsuits against Korf and Laber succeed, the charities may be forced to return the cash, even if the organizations did nothing wrong themselves, said Styron."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, commenting on an alleged Ukrainian money laundering scheme connected to millions in donations to dozens of New York charities.
The New York Post, 03/06/2021
"Laurie Styron, executive director of CharityWatch, said fixed assets on nonprofits' balance sheets are based on historical costs. If the Scouts own property sold or donated to the organization many decades ago, those values may not match current fair market value."
"Styron said real estate valuations can be complicated for a number of reasons, including whether easements or mineral rights are attached or because of local and state ordinances."
"Nonprofit organizations are often bound by restrictions in how donations can be used, experts say. For example, if a donor gives money to a program for direct aide to veterans, 'the charity is not allowed to use it on buying new software for their website,' Styron said."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, providing commentary on the financial complexities impacting the ability of sexual abuse victims to collect on legal claims against Boy Scouts of America.
USA Today, 03/02/2021
"'The reactions we get from donors are negative when they hear that they, as a middle-class working person, sent in what they could toward a charitable cause and then they find out that someone is making millions of dollars,' she said."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, conveying how small dollar donors react to the seven figure compensation packages of nonprofit executives.
The New York Times, 12/22/2020
"'A nonprofit acting as a pass-through organization for political funds is not only strictly prohibited by the IRS, it is a slap in the face to the public in cases where that same nonprofit is holding its hand out for tax-subsidized federal grants,' Styron said. 'If a nonprofit has the money to violate IRS rules by playing around in political campaigns, it's not in an ethical position to hold its hand out to taxpayers for government subsidized funding.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, commenting on Kansas elected officials who allegedly used a charity to funnel money into political campaigns and to apply for taxpayer funded grants under the CARES Act.
The Wichita Eagle, 12/13/2020
"'The financial situation for charities is analogous to what's occurring in the economy at large and the misleading way in which stock market gains are often cited as being symbolic of how the economy is doing overall,' Styron says, even as the average worker is under- or unemployed or facing wage freezes amid rising living costs."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, explaining that while overall charitable giving may be up compared to last year, larger charities have been the primary beneficiaries, while smaller charities have seen recent revenue declines of 17-18%.
"Laurie Styron, executive director of Charity Watch [sic], a non-profit charity watchdog, said social media influencers can better leverage their fame by encouraging people to donate directly to a charity with experience in helping victims of tragedies."
"'Cutting out the unnecessary middleman will improve the chances that your donation will get where it's supposed to go and will really help people,' she said."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, advising donors to give directly.
CBC News, 12/09/2020
In her interview with The Global Thinking Foundation, CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, advises donors with tips on wise giving to charity, and on avoiding common charity accounting tricks that inflate perceived program accomplishments. The takeaway? It is possible to maintain optimism and generosity in our giving habits while also being proactive and discerning so our donations to charity can have a real impact each time we give.
The Global Thinking Foundation, 12/03/2020
"'There are a lot of nonprofits with their hands out right now, and most of them are great,' said Laurie Styron, executive director of CharityWatch, a watchdog group. 'But there are some that will take advantage of a crisis.'"
"'With a big crisis, some charities try to get in on the action because they don't want to miss out on fundraising opportunities.' said Styron at CharityWatch."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, advising donors to direct their donations to charities with an established track record in a particular cause, and to avoid those that take advantage of a crisis for fundraising opportunities.
"Compensation to close family members of an organization's trustees or key employees must be disclosed on the tax filing, said Laurie Styron, the director of CharityWatch, a watchdog group."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, discussing public disclosure rules for charities that install close family members in key positions.
The New York Post, 11/21/2020
"Few donors have the time or inclination to deeply research this...If a business is ethical, it needs to say to what degree it's really helping the charity."
- CharityWatch encourages for-profit thrift stores to operate ethically by disclosing specific amounts of purchases that will go to charity.
"'Charities need to be spending money on the activities that they're soliciting donations for, they need to be honoring donors' intent,' Styron said. 'If making these kinds of payments is in line with how they've been raising money from donors and the donors who gave money to them are okay with this type of grant or dues or payment then, in and of itself, this transaction isn't necessarily problematic.'"
"'Where this would be problematic is if the charity is not being forthcoming with its donors about these payments and these types of payments are something the donors might have a problem with,' Styron said. 'It gets into a little bit of a gray area here, it's not so cut and dry.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, emphasizing the importance of understanding donor intent when determining whether or not certain charity grants or payments are reasonable.
Yankee Institute for Public Policy, 10/19/2020
"Meanwhile, CharityWatch — which in the past has awarded the MDA an 'A' grade — rated the MDA a 'D' based on its 2019 numbers. CharityWatch points to several areas of concern, observing that the MDA spent only 51 percent of its budget on programs last year, that it costs the organization $49 to raise each $100 in cash support from the public, and that its fundraising expenses have increased 152 percent since 2016 while contributions have decreased 16 percent in that time. By the end of last year, the organization had a deficit fund balance of more than $700,000, meaning it owed more to outside parties than the value of its assets. While not significant relative to the MDA's annual budget — more than $112 million — there was, in essence, nothing saved for a rainy day."
- CharityWatch provides an updated financial analysis of Muscular Dystrophy Association as it prepares to relaunch its popular telethon with new host, Kevin Hart.
The Hollywood Reporter, 10/16/2020
"'The purpose of a tax-subsidized public charity is not to support one person's speaking events or golf tournaments. A charity needs to be able to show the public that it is delivering on its mission. The 2015 through 2018 tax filings don't reflect that. Most expenses have gone towards covering the expenses of golf tournaments and overhead costs,' Styron wrote in an email after reviewing the tax forms."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, assessing the financial activities of the Tommy Tuberville Foundation.
The Associated Press, 10/12/2020
"'In 2016 the charity (VARC) reports paying its president over $1 million in base compensation, bonuses, and other reportable compensation without justifying why this level of compensation was necessary, what it consisted of, or how it was computed,' Styron said."
"She added, 'The bottom line is this: Could the charity recruit and retain a leader with the necessary skills, education, expertise, and experience for substantially less, or is what they are paying this executive representative of market rate?'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, providing insight into what variables should be considered when determining if high executive compensation is reasonable and justified.
The LaCrosse Independent, 09/09/2020
"Laurie Styron, executive director at CharityWatch, noted the IRS deemed the organization to be a private foundation, not a public charity. The foundation should have completed a Form 990-PF, instead of a Form 990. That form would still require the organization to provide an accounting of its revenues and expenses. And the form would still have to be made available to the public. But it would not have included the same questions about relationships between board members."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, contributing financial analysis and research into Arizona-based charity, American Sheriff Foundation, founded by Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb.
The Arizona Republic, 08/31/2020
"'Opportunists swoop in on the coattails of legitimate tragedies to capitalize on emotionally charged moments at their most viral peaks,' Styron told The News & Observer in an email. 'They often disappear just as quickly before anyone has a chance to scrutinize their legitimacy or reasonableness.'"
"'A few individuals whose stories are highly publicized are sometimes flooded with more resources than they could earn in ten lifetimes, while leaving most others in similarly dire situations to fend for themselves,' Styron said. She said the platforms are 'not equipped to distribute funding in a way that will improve the lives of entire communities.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, encouraging donors to consider the downsides of donating through crowdfunding platforms in response to a tragedy.
The Charlotte Observer, 08/28/2020
"'Donors, whatever programs or projects they choose to support, need to be vigilant and proactive in thinking about whether or not the people promising certain outcomes in exchange for their donations are equipped to deliver on them, have a track record of delivering on similar projects, and are transparent enough to ensure donations will be used for the intended purposes,' Styron said."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, commenting on We Build the Wall's $25 million crowdfunding campaign and the subsequent arrests of those alleged to have diverted funds for personal use.
"'For a charity that was already holding onto more than two-and-a-half years' worth of donations before its cash influx, it's unclear if this organization is prepared to spend donations within a timeframe that most donors would find reasonable,' Styron said."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, questioning the spending practices of celebrity funded charity Chicago Community Bail Fund.
The Washington Free Beacon, 08/12/2020
"'With Karfunkel having one foot firmly planted in both Kodak and in the religious organization receiving the stock donation, it's unclear if enough board independence existed for this donation to be properly vetted and approved at arm's length prior to being accepted,' Styron said."
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, commenting on alleged improprieties related to a stock donation worth more than $100 million between a board member of a for-profit company and the religious charity for which he serves as president.
"'Donors may get a 'false sense of security' when seeing that a charity's officers are all volunteer or low-paid,' said Laurie Styron, executive director of CharityWatch, a nonprofit watchdog group...'They equate this with thinking that more of their donation is supporting direct programs rather than overhead, when this is not necessarily the case,' Styron said. 'Donors can end up feeling duped when they discover that a charity executive is raking in big cash while simultaneously finding convenient and often perfectly legal ways to avoid including these payments in their other reported compensation.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, warning donors to not assume a nonprofit is operating efficiently just because it reports low executive compensation.
The Houston Chronicle, 08/03/2020
"'Once fixed assets like land, building, and equipment are excluded, this charity is sitting on more than 18 years worth of its annual spending, based on 2018 reporting... That's too much. At current spending levels, this charity has enough assets to continue operating until the year 2036 without raising another penny from government contracts or other revenue.'"
"'In 2018 the president's (Barnard's) bonus makes up over 40% of her total compensation, yet the charity hasn't disclosed to the public how this bonus was computed and what metrics were used to justify it,' Styron said. 'We aren't talking about a $500 bonus here. This is $327,000. Her bonus, alone, is many times the annual compensation of what many nonprofit leaders earn to run an organization. The public deserves more disclosure from the nonprofit's board justifying on what basis this high level of compensation is appropriate and necessary.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, comments on operations of a Wisconsin charity with high executive compensation and nearly two decades of assets in reserve.
The La Crosse Independent, 07/31/2020
"'I have seen a number of examples over the years of Private Foundations starting out strong, ebbing and flowing, and eventually petering out,' she said. 'An athlete, actor, musician, or other celebrity in their quest to support charitable causes, whether out of genuine interest, good public relations and image, or some combination of the two, sometimes will start and actively support a private foundation for a number of years before gradually losing interest and letting it peter out.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, commenting on the financial reporting of Original Americans Foundation and other private foundations.
Yahoo! Sports, 07/08/2020
"'What this tells us is that, at least for 2018, this organization appears to have largely been funded by a small group of people.'"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, commenting on concentrations in funding sources of anti-discrimination charity TIME'S UP Now.
The Hollywood Reporter, 06/05/2020
"'When you have these highly inefficient charities siphoning all the resources away from efficient ones, that's not in anyone's best interest.' said Laurie Styron. [...]"
- CharityWatch Executive Director, Laurie Styron, commenting on high fundraising costs at law enforcement charities.
The Oklahoman, 05/31/2020
"'A lot of people are very sympathetic, so they give unknowingly. A fundraiser can take advantage of that fact...If people actually knew what's going on with these groups they wouldn't give to them.'"
- Daniel Borochoff, CharityWatch president, on F ratings issued to Disabled Veterans National Foundation (DVNF) for exorbitant fundraising costs and meager spending on veterans.
Mother Jones, 03/09/2020
"...CharityWatch still give[s] Livestrong good marks for being financially healthy overall and transparent in how it spends."
The Associated Press, 02/11/2020
"Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy [CharityWatch], said Sekulow appears to be mixing his defense of Trump with his charitable endeavors. ... 'Charities are not supposed to be taking sides in partisan political activities, such as providing legal services to benefit a politician in an impeachment trial,' Borochoff said. 'Regulators should investigate whether or not charitable resources, such as office, labor, equipment, etc., are being wrongly utilized to benefit Sekulow's for-profit law firm.'"
The Associated Press, 01/30/2020
"Borochoff said it is fair to ask whether Burning Man's tax status as a nonprofit is appropriate. 'One could make the argument, should they even be a nonprofit? (Burning Man Project) would argue they're promoting the arts, but it's not black and white. They probably like the tax benefits,' said Borochoff. 'Are they a public benefit? I'm sure that people -- I've met some of them -- they say, "It's mind expanding. Wow," but is this a benefit to the public ? [That] [t]hey don't pay taxes because it improves the spirit of the world?'"
Reno Gazette Journal, 01/09/2020
"People need confidence, and if they know there's a tough watchdog like CharityWatch out there, they're going to be more willing to give." [CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff]
Long Beach Business Journal, 11/04/2019
"It's expensive for charities to hire telemarketers to call you and ask for money. Your dollars might better serve these groups if you give directly to the charity of your choice, not the one that slipped past your usual call screening. Borochoff [CharityWatch president] also notes that with cold calls, most money typically goes to fund-raising expenses rather than the cause."
Better Homes & Gardens, 10/30/2019
"'People in a hurry and who are concerned about how others in line judge their generosity are irritated with being asked to give at point of purchase. It's not a smart way to give because one should research a charity before donating.'"
- Daniel Borochoff, CharityWatch president, on retail store checkout charity giving.
NBC Atlanta, 10/22/2019
"But Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of CharityWatch...said Miracle Flights shouldn't be asking for money when it has about 15 years' worth of reserves in the bank... 'It's a poor basis to ask for money when they've already got so much money,' Borochoff said. 'My question would be, "You've got this balance of $44 million. Couldn't you spend some of that before you take my hard-earned money?"'"
Las Vegas Review-Journal, 10/12/2019
"'The way the rules are set up now it's so easy for charities to trick the readers of their statements,' said Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of CharityWatch. 'A state like California—with outsized influence—changing regulations could prompt broader improvements in accounting,' he said."
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, commenting on California legislation that would encourage charities to stop wildly inflating their program expenses by requiring them to value donated drugs and medical supplies bound for overseas distribution based on their costs in those foreign markets rather than what they would cost in the U.S.
Bloomberg Law, 10/08/2019
"'We don't believe that charities like Southwest Key Programs should grant loans to for-profit companies,' says Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch. 'Charitable organizations, unlike banks, are not in a position to have a large and diversified loan portfolio that can serve as protection against bad loans or an economic recession.'"
- Translated from BBC World News, Spanish language edition.
BBC World News, 09/06/2019
"CharityWatch, a reputable and independent watchdog for more than 25 years, offers a list of trustworthy charities you can consider at charitywatch.org...If you plan to donate, use CharityWatch as a clearinghouse to ensure it benefits Hurricane Dorian's survivors they [sic] way you intend."
- From the Editorial Staff of the Houma Courier.
Houma Courier, 09/06/2019
"'Some of these organizations are very sophisticated, complex groups that require a very sophisticated background in order to run well,' Borochoff said. 'I always ask the question, if they were to pay less, could they (get) an equally qualified individual for that position.'"
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on the overcompensation of nonprofit executives.
Detroit Free Press, 08/23/2019
"'There [are] a lot of mishaps, a lot of problems, that can occur if there's not adequate oversight,' said Daniel Borochoff, who advocates for more accountability as the head of CharityWatch."
"'It's like walking through a minefield, donating to an efficient veterans charity,' he said. 'I find it frustrating when you see these solicitations, and they ask you to help a needy veteran, and you look into the finance and see most of the money is actually being spent educating the public that injured veterans have needs, rather than meeting the needs.'"
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, commenting on the issues that donors face when donating to a veteran's charity.
"'Philanthropy has a long history of turning bad money into good deeds...Do you want children not to get adequate health care because you want to take the moral high ground?' Borochoff says that it wouldn't make sense for an organization to accept funding from a donor whose controversial behavior was in direct contradiction to the group's mission, such as a women's shelter receiving money from a convicted abuser."
The Hollywood Reporter, 07/11/2019
"'In relation to other nonprofit organizations, he is paid more than just about anybody else in the field,' said Daniel Borochoff, president of Charity Watch [sic], a nonprofit watchdog. 'Do they need to pay him this in order to operate well? Or are there other executives that they would be able to hire that would be able to do the job as well at a lower cost?'"
- Mr. Borochoff on NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre's $1.4+ million annual compensation and benefits.
"Regarding the [$17 million] sale of the Livestrong headquarters, Daniel Borochoff, president of Chicago-based CharityWatch, which rates and evaluates charities for donors, said that 'a lot of groups sell their building when it appreciates — it's not odd or unusual. It may very well be the prudent thing for them to do if they can find more economical office space that suits their needs... As a charity, they don't necessarily need a super deluxe office. It's better that they're able to direct more resources to their cause...'"
Austin American-Statesman, 04/19/2019
"The president of Chicago-based watchdog group 'Charity Watch' [sic] told Newschannel 3 any nonprofit that hires a family member needs to justify that it's in the best interest of the organization and not nepotism. 'A lot of scandals in the nonprofit field take place when family gets involved because internal controls break down and collusion is too easy to take place when family is working together,' Charity Watch [sic] President Daniel Borochoff said."
CBS West Michigan, 03/04/2019
"'I don't want to pat them on the back too much for, basically, not pulling a bait-and-switch [as the charity had done for over a decade] and being up front about what the prize actually is...'"
- Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, on San Diego Ronald McDonald House finally offering the highly advertised dream house to its raffle winner.
The San Diego Union-Tribune, 02/18/2019
"'It looks like a CEO takeover of the organization,' Daniel Borochoff, president of Chicago-based CharityWatch, said when The [Buffalo] News described the situation to him. 'The board needs to be deciding who's voted in and who's voted out. They did make that decision, and he's still operating as if he's the CEO. There's enough money involved that regulators would be interested in this.'"
- Mr. Borochoff on the governance scandal at Buffalo's $50 million/year Community Action Organization where the board unsuccessfully attempted to fire the CEO and instead got many of its own members fired.
The Buffalo News, 02/17/2019
"... He [CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff] wishes it [Salvation Army] would be more transparent. 'It would increase the integrity of the Salvation Army if they...[disclosed] the compensation of their top people, as other charities do,' Borochoff said."
[Note: CharityWatch rates the Salvation Army-Central Territory and its other three Territories, based on their audited financial statements and other factors.]
CBS Minnesota, 02/11/2019
"'People should give right to the organization that they want to support. Why are they [We Build The Wall, Inc.] directing money to some other entity?' Borochoff said. 'This money could get stolen or misdirected to be used for another purpose.'"
- Daniel Borochoff commenting on how the new nonprofit organization started by the founder of the border wall GoFundMe campaign raises a "huge red flag" for directing check donations to a separate organization with a different name.
The Daily Caller News Foundation, 01/14/2019
"'Violating the intention of those donors, raising (money) for purpose x then distributing it as purpose y, that's wrong,' he said."
- Daniel Borochoff commenting on seeing federal super PACs masquerade as charities to potential donors.
The Cap Times, 01/09/2019
"'People really need to be careful that they're giving to legitimate organizations or people and not just scammers,' says Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch."
"... [T]here's no way of guaranteeing crowdfunding campaigns are legitimate or will use donated funds for stated purposes. Unlike nonprofit charities, online fund-raisers are not subject to financial reporting requirements or other regulations... [D]onors should contribute only to online campaigns run by people they know or by public charities."
- CharityWatch analyst, Stephanie Kalivas, commenting on the GoFundMe homeless veteran Johnny Bobbit "scam".
The Philadelphia Inquirer, 11/15/2018
"'Philanthropy has a long history of accepting gifts from people that aren't model citizens,' he said in an interview with CP. 'If there's a concern that he might be a racist, then by putting his money to programs that discourage racism and show how wrong and horrible racism is, then that can very well be worth it.'"
- Daniel Borochoff commenting on The International African-American Museum accepting a $5 million donation from Rosalind and Jerry Richardson. Jerry Richardson has been accused of a years-long pattern of racial and sexual misconduct.
Charleston City Paper, 11/02/2018
"CharityWatch, a nonprofit watchdog group in Chicago, gives the national Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S. and Foundation an F rating, primarily because less than half of the organization's proceeds go to non-fundraising activities."
Chicago Tribune, 09/19/2018
"The problem [with crowdfunding]...is 'there's so much stuff that goes up on their site [GoFundMe], there is no way to realistically vet everything,' [Stephanie] Kalivas [CharityWatch analyst] said. 'And even if the money goes to the right person, there's no follow-up. You don't know how the money was spent.'"
The Columbus Dispatch, 09/16/2018
"The 30-day window to file a claim [with GoFundMe] is restrictive, said Daniel Borochoff, president of the watchdog group CharityWatch. 'Typically, you wouldn't even know the money was misspent because there wouldn't be all of this reporting,' he said. To Borochoff, the Bobbitt case is an example of why donors are better off contributing to nonprofits that are subject to regulations and financial reporting requirements. 'GoFundMe is a business,' Borochoff said. 'Their biggest concern is not overseeing the legitimacy of all of these campaigns they're conducting, so there's very little in the way of regulations. It's easy pickings for a scammer.'"
The Philadelphia Inquirer, 09/06/2018
"'This is outrageous,' Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, stated. Charity Watch [sic] is a nationally acclaimed non-profit watchdog. 'I would tell him to get out of the charity field because he's taking money away that could go to actually helping veterans,' said Borochoff. '... think about it, $5 million over the last three years, that could be benefiting veterans who really need help,' said Borochoff."
NBC News Tampa, 09/04/2018
"'I'm glad that government regulators are shutting down some scam charities that have been ripping off donors for years. But we must remain vigilant; there are still far too many unethical or poorly performing charities still actively soliciting our dollars. This is particularly true with veterans and military charities,' said CharityWatch President Daniel Borochoff."
"Daniel Borochoff, founder and president of Chicago-based CharityWatch, has criticized the raffles over the years because it is unlikely the main advertised prize would ever be given away. 'It should be called 'The Castle in the Sky Raffle' with a disclaimer that it is constructed with pipe dreams,' he said. Borochoff said it could be a step in the right direction that the Ronald McDonald House Charities of San Diego has parted ways with a for-profit consultant [to run the raffle], because it probably means more raffle money could go to the charity. However, he said it would be better if a house were actually given away in the next raffle. 'They could just do a less costly house based on the amount of tickets they can reasonably expect to sell,' Borochoff said."
- Daniel Borochoff commenting on dream house raffles.
The San Diego Union-Tribune, 06/19/2018
"... [T]he payment structure for [CEO] Young is problematic, partially because it could chase away future donors. 'One thing that really bothers me with this setup is, if he's the CEO, it's part of his job,' Borochoff said. 'And the organization is a team, it's not an individual. You could have staffers or board members or volunteers cultivate donors, and then he's going to claim he deserves this percentage [of a donation] because he's brought in at some point in the process?' [...] Borochoff said 'another thing that's crazy about this arrangement is that he could decide to spend all his time raising money and neglect the operations of the clinic.'"
- Daniel Borochoff commenting on why a Baton Rouge nonprofit leader requesting a 'finder's fee' for donations is problematic.
The Advocate, 05/23/2018
"While the NRA Foundation has an A-plus rating from Charity Watch [sic], the watchdog group says organizations that receive NRA money should be transparent about it. 'If you had a program on gun safety you'd want to know if it was funded by the NRA or an anti-gun control group,' said Charity Watch [sic] president Daniel Borochoff. 'Just as if you had a program on nutrition and health you'd want to know if it was funded by McDonald's or Philip Morris.'"
Fox News, Charlotte, NC, 05/03/2018
"Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of CharityWatch, a nonprofit watchdog group, said a trend of board members becoming staff members is unusual. 'Something doesn't seem right there, to have that many people moving from the board to the staff,' he said. 'The key concern is: Did these people have an unfair advantage as former board members?' Borochoff said it would be important for an organization to show that it had interviewed multiple candidates and done a thorough job search before deciding to hire a board member."
The Virginian-Pilot, 04/20/2018
"Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of the watchdog CharityWatch, says if you're not careful, you could end up giving to the wrong group. ... [An] example, he says, is the New York-based American Foundation for the Blind, which gets a rating of B- from CharityWatch, and the Virginia-based American Council of the Blind, which gets a rating of F from the watchdog."
Consumer Reports, 03/22/2018
"Daniel Borochoff, founder and president of Chicago-based CharityWatch, has been critical of dream house raffles in the past but acknowledged it could be the easiest way for some charities to make cash for a good cause. "If the charity feels this is the most cost-efficient way for it to raise money, without misleading people ... then it is a good thing," he said. "Charities need to be concerned about appearances and trust," he said. "If I was running that charity, I would say, 'We need to give away a house. I don't want to be associated with something where you are giving the impression you are giving away a house to people, and you're not doing it year after year after year.'"
- Daniel Borochoff commenting on why all charities must always practice transparency in their solicitation of donations.
The San Diego Union-Tribune, 03/18/2018
"Circle of Friends for American Veterans and the Center for American Homeless Veterans, received 'Fs' from CharityWatch, a nonprofit organization that uses an A+ to F scale to rate nonprofits based on their financial transparency and spending habits. 'It's somewhat of a minefield for donors to locate a high-performing veterans charity,' said Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch."
The Center for Public Integrity, 12/13/2017
"CharityWatch, a Chicago-based watchdog group, gives the Salvation Army's four regional headquarters financial efficiency ratings ranging from B-plus to A-minus. 'It's great that they run their kettle campaign ... with staff or volunteers rather than professional fund-raising companies that may give the charity only a small percentage of the donations collected,' CharityWatch President Daniel Borochoff said in an email."
Religion News Service, 12/02/2017
"If you have a group of charities you regularly support, don't shortchange them because you donated to hurricane victims, says Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, a watchdog organization. 'There are times in this life when you need to step up and do more, and this is one of them.'"
Kiplinger's Personal Finance, 12/2017
"'This type of impulse donation [giving to charity in the check-out line] is okay if its [sic] just a small amount,' he [CharityWatch's president, Daniel Borochoff] said, 'but if you're making a more significant donation you really ought to do some research and find the charity of your choice who can do the most with your donation.'"
Great Falls Tribune, 11/20/2017
"Borochoff [president of CharityWatch] said donors should only contribute to a crowdfunding campaign if they trust the organizer, such as if it is someone they personally know or a respected community leader. If donors want to contribute to a non-profit organization, they should do so directly through the organization itself rather than through a crowdfunding website, which may collect its own fees from donations, he said."
"Use crowdfunding websites cautiously. While you can turn to a site such as GoFundMe or GiveForward to make donations to people you know, [CharityWatch president, Daniel] Borochoff says that with others, it can be difficult to know whether a fundraising campaign is legitimate and whether the money will be used as represented."
Consumer Reports, 10/19/2017
"Cultural affinity reasons may resonate, but they shouldn't get in the way of helping fellow human beings who fly the same flag, says Daniel Borochoff of the relief organization rating group CharityWatch. 'It's a humanitarian crisis down there and they are U.S. citizens,' he says. 'It would be like helping people in Hawaii.'"
- CharityWatch's president on why Americans donating $100s of millions to hurricane victims in Texas and Florida should also help Hurricane Maria victims in Puerto Rico.
USA Today, 10/05/2017
"'We don't just accept what the charity reports, we actually do a deep dive [analysis] to figure out how your money is really being spent,' he [Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch] says."
Houston Public Media, 09/18/2017
"'[Donors should] not give solely based on the celebrity connection, but give based on...the charity's plan to help, and this group [J.J. Watt Foundation] has not been that specific on what they're going to do [with the $33 million raised in response to hurricane Harvey].'"
Houston Press, 09/14/2017
"Indeed, knowing how your dollars or donations will be used during and beyond an event is important before you give, [CharityWatch president, Daniel] Borochoff said. 'Sometimes a charity will raise more money than is needed for the cause, which could open the door for the charity to take advantage of having the overflow money,' he said. 'Find out how the money will be used and earmark your donation for a specific disaster so it's clear how you want your money allocated.'"
"We don't have infinite charitable resources. We have to accomplish as much as we can with the limited charitable resources we have," said Daniel Borochoff, president of the watchdog group CharityWatch. "So if groups decide to stockpile it, then that money is not freely available. It is not available to groups that would be using it to help people in need that are not receiving help, particularly with the government cutbacks."
The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 07/26/2017
"'This is all highly unusual, and it gives an appearance of conflicts of interest that any nonprofit should want to avoid...'"
- Daniel Borochoff on the excessive amount of related party transactions at Jay Sekulow's charity, Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism / ACLJ.
The Guardian, 06/27/2017
"...[T]here have been instances of what Daniel Borochoff, head of the charity watchdog group CharityWatch, terms crowd-thieving: people taking advantage of others' good will."
Consumer Reports, 05/20/2017
"CharityWatch, a Chicago-based nonprofit that evaluates and rates other nonprofits, gives Kars4Kids a D grade. 'They ought to [say] you are helping proselytize to secular Jews so they can become orthodox,' said Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, who said he is Jewish. 'What's even worse is their ad makes it out that they are helping kids in general.'"
Star Tribune, 05/04/2017
"Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, a watchdog group based in Chicago, noted Livestrong's decline in revenue but said the foundation had a net fund balance of $75.9 million at the end of 2015. 'They have breathing room. They can ride it out. It's the risk of being so closely associated with an individual. But on the good side, it never would have been such a big charity if it had not been for Lance's celebrity,' he said."
Houston Chronicle, 04/30/2017
"Charities are not required to publicize their compensation to celebrities, although failing to do so may not reflect the highest standards of philanthropy. 'Sometimes the compensation is hard to find, and a celebrity gets credit for caring about something when the reason he actually cares about it is because he or his foundation is getting paid,' Borochoff [CharityWatch's president] said."
The Boston Globe, 04/22/2017
"Individually, people can contribute to the agencies whose private relief efforts will relieve hunger in the areas that are suffering. CharityWatch.org has a list of top-rated charities on its website — Africare, the American Refugee Committee, Catholic Relief Services and the International Rescue Committee all receive an A-plus."
Santa Fe New Mexican, 04/08/2017
"'If a celebrity product marketer comes to them, they will probably be tempted to accept terms that maybe aren't as good as they could be.' he says. 'But I do think they have an obligation to their supporters to be clear about how it helps the cause.'"
- Daniel Borochoff on how donors are not aware that charities frequently "get the short end of the stick" when it comes to promotional deals with marketing businesses.
The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 04/04/2017
"Daniel Borochoff, president of Charity Watch, an independent watchdog group, said Colorado's [tax form] checkoff list appeared to be 'a random grouping of whatever the pet interests or contacts of the legislators are.' ...'If they're on the official state form, probably a lot of people are thinking that it's been vetted or checked out,' Borochoff added. 'That doesn't appear to be the case.'"
The Denver Post, 02/28/2017
"Borochoff [CharityWatch's President] said charities have an even higher standard to be seen as fair and 'above board' because of their status as a nonprofit."
The San Diego Union-Tribune, 01/23/2017
"'The fundraiser might be keeping 75 to 90 percent of the money,' says Borochoff of CharityWatch. Sometimes, he says, charities may end up paying fundraisers more than they take in, leaving the group with a loss."
Consumer Reports, 12/14/2016
"Just because a charity sends a gift, there's no obligation to donate and no need to feel guilty if you use the item — 'it's being done to manipulate you,' [CharityWatch's] Borochoff said."
Tampa Bay Times, 12/12/2016
"That swirl of cash, intense interest in supporting those returning from the wars, and a lack of long-established organizations to serve as models for best practices have conspired to create what...Daniel Borochoff, the president of CharityWatch, called a 'minefield' for potential donors [to veterans charities]."
The New York Times, 11/04/2016
"Over all, it seems that 'people don't understand charities,' Mr. Borochoff says. The differences that distinguish the institutions— in size, scope, and mission — seem lost on the public and many reporters."
- CharityWatch president on the vast differences between the Donald J. Trump Foundation and the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation
The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 09/29/2016
"The charity needs to make a good faith effort to be as accurate and clear in their solicitations or fundraising...Only if you read the fine print, do you see they have a big loophole, a big out."
- CharityWatch president on why Ronald McDonald House Charities should not use a fine print loophole to avoid giving away the dream house in its "Dream House Raffle"
The San Diego Union-Tribune, 08/31/2016
"'It's a public charity, and you have a board of directors with one independent board member,' he said. 'That means that he [Dwayne Wade] and his sister can make all the decisions for a public charity, so it would be better to broaden the board to represent the public's interest.'"
- Daniel Borochoff on governance concerns at Wade's World Foundation, founded by NBA star, Dwayne Wade
Chicago Tribune, 07/24/2016
"Very few donors would agree to that high of a fundraising cost. You're talking about other people's money. You're ripping off the donating public...(and) when it's a hot button issue like veterans, they'll give."
- Mr. Borochoff on Veterans Assistance Foundation's 83% fundraising cost.
The Capital Times, 07/12/2016
"'Our charitable resources are getting locked away,' Borochoff said. 'Particularly with the way the economy is, where a portion of the population is really struggling, really suffering and in dire need of charitable aid, it's problematic for us to be taking $15 billion off the table for later.'"
- CharityWatch's president, Daniel Borochoff on the huge amount of charitable dollars that are annually being placed in donor-advised funds for use sometime in the future.
The Washington Post, 06/21/2016
"One of the charities that Donald Trump selected to receive a donation from his veterans' fundraiser [Foundation for American Veterans] with a rating of "F" from CharityWatch..."
-Article on the presidential candidate's questionable vetting of charities.
The Washington Post, 06/01/2016
"Livestrong officials have had to 'redesign their revenue generation based on what their programs are rather than Lance's celebrity,' said Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, a watchdog group."
- Mr. Borochoff on how a shrunken Livestrong survives and prospers after disassociating itself from its tainted founder, Lance Armstrong.
USA Today, 5/04/2016
"Groups that hold fundraisers for charities should distribute the funds to those charities as rapidly as possible. By not doing so it delays aid or assistance to people in need of help and increases the risk that these funds get diverted to something other than their intended use."
-Mr. Borochoff on the controversy surrounding what happened to millions of dollars that Donald Trump generated at his fundraiser for veterans charities.
The Daily Beast, 4/22/2016
"Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, a Chicago organization that monitors nonprofits, said he believes Wounded Warrrior Project began to operate more like a major business than a charity as it grew. 'The public are not OK with people in charities staying in five-star hotels...or spending on first-class travel,' he said."
The Wall Street Journal, 3/11/2016
"Sites like GoFundMe don't guarantee that everything is above-board," said Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch. "We have limited charitable dollars and it's important that they not be wasted through fraudulent or well-intentioned but incompetent efforts."
- Mr. Borochoff on the pitfalls of utilizing crowd sourcing sites to donate to individuals who say they are helping with the Flint Michigan water crisis.
Detroit Free Press, 2/18/2016
“Even with those declines, the charity remains strong financially based on $92 million in reported assets, said Daniel Borochoff, founder of CharityWatch. ‘They have a lot of time to rebuild their reputation and regain donor and public support,’ Borochoff said. ‘They have significant reserves. People don't need to be panicky this group will be folding.’”
- Mr. Borochoff commenting on the unexpected resignation of LiveStrong's new CEO and the continued fall-off in revenue years after the Lance Armstrong doping scandal.
The Associated Press, 1/19/2016
“‘Often, donors want to get rid of their cars without hassle, get a tax-deduction and move on,’ Borochoff said. ‘This allows questionable actors to get involved because people aren’t being careful,’ he said.”
- Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, a nonprofit watchdog group, said that the car donation charity industry is particularly ripe for abuse because donors are often less thoughtful about where the proceeds from their cars end up than where their donated cash goes.
Los Angeles Times, 12/1/2015
“Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, said charities sold information as a form of fund-raising, which can be positive. By allowing a group to sell your contact information, you're in effect increasing the impact of your donation: ‘It's an important revenue stream for the charity.’
But, he said, charities should make their policies clear, so donors can make an informed decision. ‘It's very much a personal preference,’ he said.”
The New York Times, 12/1/2015
“‘It can get kind of funny,’ says Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch. A charity might ‘say the fund-raising that interrupted your dinner is a program service because they ask you to pray for people who are suffering in the Sudan, or ask you to fly a flag and show you’re patriotic. Then they can magically turn the cost of that solicitation call into a program service.’”
Readers Digest, 12/2015
And once you are on their radar, charities typically will start spending marketing dollars to chase you for more donations.
"It's like you're teasing the charities. They think: 'They gave us a little; maybe if we ask, they'll give us a lot.'"
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on why it's better to give larger donations to a few charities rather than smaller gifts to lots of groups.
"If people read the fine print, they would probably not be that impressed with it ... People should be careful not to feel too good, because you're helping in a very miniscule way."
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, commenting on how charity affinity credit cards may contribute a tiny portion of a transaction to charity.
Chicago Tribune, 11/09/2015
“If Jared really was interested in helping children through his foundation, he could have gotten more money... As with a lot of celebrities, the charity appears to be more about image-enhancement than charitable deeds.”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, commenting on how the now-scandalized Subway spokesman raised very little money toward his proclaimed goal of spending $2 million to fight childhood obesity.
USA Today, 8/23/2015
“‘I wish [Senator] Grassley would take this broader and not just be focusing on the Red Cross [with regard to Haiti] but focusing on all international aid and development groups and require they disclose who their grantees are … It’s basic information that donors ought to have access to.’”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on the American Red Cross withholding information about their international grantees.
The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 7/24/2015
“‘They’ll itemize how much was spent on office supplies and then it’ll be $15m in unidentified stuff sent to Africa or the Pacific islands. Can’t you get more specific? Can’t you describe it?’”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on the quality of charity self reported information.
The Guardian, 6/5/2015
“[CharityWatch president Daniel Borochoff] said if a charity does not have its financial statements audited, donors should be cautious. ‘People don’t look as closely at charities as they do public companies, ... can you imagine what would happen to a company’s stock if it didn’t get audited? But Charities can choose to do that.’”
“Be on the lookout for innocuous-sounding advice that comes with a fund-raising appeal. If a group advises you to buckle your seatbelt, check your breast for lumps, fly the flag on July 4 or pray for victims of a disaster, this could signal that the charity is disguising some of its fund-raising costs as ‘public education,’ … ‘we see such attempts all the time.’”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff
The Wall Street Journal, 5/26/2015
“‘I’m glad to see our government regulators are putting a stop to these four outfits that for too long have been misleading the public and wasting millions of our charitable dollars ... This is a significant action, but it’s the tip of the iceberg. There are a lot of other problems like this out there. … I hope they continue to go after some of these questionable operators.’”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on the FTC and State AG’s fraud suit against four cancer charities for bilking over $187 million from donors.
The Washington Post, 5/19/2015
“‘They have made some improvements, but there are still serious concerns … We don’t feel confident about this organization as a good target for donors.’”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on Central Asia Institute’s continued “?” rating.
The Associated Press, 5/8/2015
“‘Spending just a little time on research can exponentially increase the good works accomplished by a donation.’”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on giving wisely.
The Wall Street Journal, 5/8/2015
“‘Regardless of whether you like [Hillary Clinton's] politics or not, this is a good charity.’”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on the controversy surrounding Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation
The Washington Post, 4/27/2015
“‘We believe groups shouldn't raise significantly more money than what they need because we have limited charitable resources in this country, and that's money that could be spent on other needs,’ said Daniel Borochoff, president of CharityWatch, which issued the flunking grade [to Navy SEAL Foundation for stockpiling over 5 years worth of its annual budget].”
The Virginian-Pilot, 4/9/2015
“Daniel Borochoff, president of the nonprofit watchdog CharityWatch, said that generally it's not a good idea for nonprofit leaders to hire family members. 'Internal controls break down when there's collusion,' Borochoff said, 'and family members are more likely to collude beacuse they already have those close personal relationships.'"
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 3/14/2015
“‘It might be a lot better to sell a car yourself and donate the proceeds to charity,’ ... But if you don't want the hassle and prefer using a car donation agency, he said, you should demand to know what all the processing and overhead costs are and how much of the sale price will be forwarded to the chosen charity.”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on donating cars to charity
Los Angeles Times, 2/28/2015
“‘Rotten charities that waste money...[say] 'Don't look at overhead. It's not important. It does't matter,'" Borochoff said. 'But it does matter, because it's really hard for a charity to accomplish much if so little of its proceeds are going in the direction of programs and services.'"
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on the importance of looking at overhead
Boston Globe, 1/15/2015
“CharityWatch delves a bit deeper into an organization's fundraising and other accounting practices, including how much is spent to raise each $100 of funds that are collected.”
“‘Some of these groups don't really do anything,’… ‘They just send out a bunch of mailings or make calls telling us that veterans have needs and they give this false indication that they're providing substantial aid.’… ‘The donors don't understand what's going on and the wool is being pulled over their eyes[.]’”
- CharityWatch president, Daniel Borochoff, on the disconnect between what some veteran charities actually do and what they say they do in their solicitations
Darien News (Connecticut), 6/16/2014