Celebrating 30 years of helping you give wisely
America's most independent,
assertive charity watchdog

CORE (Community Organized Relief Effort)

CharityWatch report issued
March 2023

CharityWatch Grade

Contact Information

CORE (Community Organized Relief Effort)
910 N Hill Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Other Names


Tax Status


Stated Mission

To save lives and strengthen communities affected by or vulnerable to crisis.

View similar charities
Accion International  
ActionAid USA  
Africare (DISSOLVED)  
Aid for Starving Children  
All Hands and Hearts  
American Friends Service Committee  
American Near East Refugee Aid (ANERA)  
Brother's Brother Foundation  
Catholic Medical Mission Board  
Catholic Relief Services  
Central Asia Institute  
charity: water  
Church World Service (CWS)  
Comic Relief  
Convoy of Hope  
David Livingstone Missionary Foundation  
Direct Relief & Direct Relief Foundation  
Doctors Without Borders USA  
Episcopal Relief & Development  
FINCA International  
Fistula Foundation  
Global Communities  
GlobalGiving Foundation  
Grameen Foundation USA  
HealthRight International  
Heifer International  
Humanity & Inclusion  
International Medical Corps  
International Rescue Committee  
Islamic Relief-USA  
Lutheran World Relief & IMA World Health  
MAP International  
Medical Teams International  
Mennonite Central Committee U.S.  
Mercy Corps  
New Incentives  
One Acre Fund  
Operation USA  
Opportunity International  
Partners In Health  
Planet Aid  
Project HOPE  
ReSurge International  
Rotary Foundation of Rotary International  
Salesian Missions  
Samaritan's Purse  
Sudan Relief Fund  
Team Rubicon  
Tearfund USA  
United Methodist Committee on Relief (UMCOR)  
United States Association for UNHCR  
United States Fund for UNICEF  
United to End Genocide (DISSOLVED)  
World Central Kitchen  
World Concern  
World Emergency Relief  
World Neighbors  
World Villages for Children  
Data based on Fiscal Year Ended 12/31/2021

*Why a Question Mark Rating?

CharityWatch currently has concerns about this organization and/or is unable to provide complete rating information due to the organization's nondisclosure of financial information. Please see the Analysts' Notes section for a more detailed explanation.

Governance & Transparency

CharityWatch evaluates certain criteria related to a charity's Governance and Transparency. Donors may want to consider a charity's willingness to be open and transparent with CharityWatch to be a good litmus test for determining its commitment to public accountability.
CORE (Community Organized Relief Effort)
does not meet governance benchmarks.
CORE (Community Organized Relief Effort)
does not meet transparency benchmarks.

CharityWatch Governance Concerns

See Analysts' Notes for Explanation
Provides Financial Information
Audit Accessibility
Governance: Policies
Reports regularly & consistently monitoring & enforcing compliance with a written Conflict of Interest Policy
Reports required, annual disclosure by officers, directors, and key staff of interests that could give rise to conflicts
Reports having a written Whistleblower Policy
Reports having a written Document Retention and Destruction Policy
Governance: Financials
Reports providing copy of tax form to all board members prior to filing it with IRS
Reports that financial statements were audited by an independent accountant
Governance: Board of Directors
Reports at least 5 voting board members
51% or more of voting board members reported as independent
Reports documenting minutes of board and board committee meetings
Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy No Sharing  

  Name Title Compensation
1 Ann Lee CEO $254,206
2 Jerome Lebleu COO $202,653
3 Matthew O'Connell Chief Business Officer $188,583
Name: Ann Lee
Title: CEO
Compensation: $254,206
Name: Jerome Lebleu
Title: COO
Compensation: $202,653
Name: Matthew O'Connell
Title: Chief Business Officer
Compensation: $188,583

CharityWatch Analysts perform an in-depth analysis of charities' audited financial statements and IRS tax filings, and often review other documents such as state filings, annual reports, and fundraising contracts during their evaluations. Below are select notes that CharityWatch believes may be of interest to donors.

CharityWatch has issued CORE Community Organized Relief Effort (CORE) a "?" rating for its fiscal year ended 12/31/2021 due to our specific concerns related to its independent auditors' "Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for the Year Ended December 31, 2021" in connection with its financial statement audit concerning CORE's receipt of federal government awards.

CORE reports receiving approximately $48.4 million in government grants in 2021, according to its IRS Form 990 tax filing (Part VIII, line 1e). The $48.4 million comprises approximately 42% of CORE's reported cash-based total revenue of $115,930,876 in 2021. CORE's auditors raised concerns about the organization's accounting for and reporting of federal grants in 2021, in addition to other items, as further detailed below.

According to the "Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards" section of CORE's Independent Auditors' Report, dated December 15, 2022, issued in connection with the CORE consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021:

"In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 15, 2022, on our consideration of the Organization’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Organization’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance."

Section I of the "Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for the Year Ended December 31, 2021" related to the independent auditors' reporting concerning CORE's receipt of federal government awards (the "Auditors' Schedule") states: "The auditors' report expresses an unmodified opinion on whether the consolidated financial statements of CORE Community Organized Relief Effort were prepared in accordance with general[ly] accepted accounting principles.” An “unmodified opinion” means that in the opinion of the auditors, the organization’s financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. However, such an opinion does not guarantee that an organization’s financial statements are free from error.

The auditors report that during the federal awards audit process they identified “Material weakness(es)” and “Significant deficiencies” in CORE’s “Internal control over financial reporting” of its financial statements. A material weakness is one or more control deficiencies that create a reasonable possibility of material misstatement in an organization’s financial statements. This does not necessarily mean that a material misstatement has occurred, but rather that the organization’s internal controls might not be good enough to detect or prevent a material misstatement from occurring. A significant deficiency is a single weakness or combination of weaknesses in an organization’s internal controls sufficient to merit scrutiny of those responsible for administering its financial reporting. Under "Internal control over major programs" for Federal Awards on the Auditors' Schedule, the auditors report that the "Auditee" (CORE) does not "qualif[y] as low-risk auditee".

Section II of the Auditors' Schedule, "Findings Financial Statements Audit," states that CORE's staff did not have sufficient information available to be able to prepare an accurate and complete Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the audit. This was "[d]ue to the Organization's rapid response to support [COVID] testing efforts nationwide" which caused CORE to experience "a surge in workforce capacity, while implementing systems, processes, and controls." Additionally, the Auditors' Schedule states that CORE "faced turnover in management and accounting personnel during 2021 as well as significant growth in the number and complexity of contracts..."

As a result, according to the Auditors' Schedule: "Significant auditor assistance was required to identify the grants and correct expenditure amounts to be included in the SEFA. Modifications to the original SEFA included the addition of 3 Assistance Listing programs, 9 grants, and approximately $20 million in expenditures." The Auditors' Schedule also reported: "Inaccurate reporting of the federal expenditures in the SEFA could result [in] inaccurate major program determinations, risk assessments, identification of compliance requirements, and ultimately incomplete reporting of federal funds expended to granting agencies." 

For the "Recommendation" regarding the material weaknesses in CORE's Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, the auditors state: "We recommend management implement more robust procedures and policies around tracking of federal grants and the related expenditures to ensure accurate and complete reporting of the SEFA..." The "Management's Response" that follows the Recommendation states: "CORE disagrees that the observed condition represents a material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting." The Management's Response cites several mitigating factors, such as "noncompliance at the pass-through entity level" and "the delayed issuance" of information by the government necessary to complete required reporting. CORE's management also states: "CORE now maintains a matrix of all grant awards which includes information on the funding source, award and CFDA numbers [Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers assigned for each government award]. Management reviews this information monthly for accuracy and completeness." The "Auditor Response" to CORE's management acknowledges and agrees that not all necessary information was provided to CORE, but it also states: "The auditor believes ultimate responsibility for obtaining all necessary information from granting agencies lies with the receiving agency, including keeping up with changes in federal award requirements."

Regarding the Recognition of Revenue by CORE, the Auditors' Schedule reports: "Revenue may not be recognized accurately or in the proper period." The auditors' recommendation includes that "management implement more robust procedures and policies around tracking of grants, grant requirements, and revenue recognition..." In response, CORE's management characterized this revenue recognition issue, which related to $1.8 million, as an "oversight" and stated that "although regrettable, [it] represents 1% of total revenues." The "Management's Response" by CORE also includes: "These conditions surfaced during the 2020 audit which was finalized in January 2022. The 2021 audit started five months later in June of 2022. At the completion of the 2020 audit, CORE agreed that a significant deficiency in control design existed and immediately took action to resolve the control weakness by hiring seasoned non-profit accounting professionals, implementing more thorough monthly review processes, and starting the process to transition to a more robust ERP [Enterprise Resource Planning] system which includes detective revenue recognition controls."

With respect to CORE's Document Retention, the Auditors' Schedule reports: "During the course of the audit, we noted certain documentation was not maintained to support the review and approval process" of certain items. The items cited include:

–  No available documented approval of payroll prior to processing for approximately 50 of the 100 samples tested.

–  No available documented approval of invoices for approximately 35 of the 100 samples tested with respect to authorization and approval of disbursements.

–  No available documented approval of invoices for 37 of the 40 samples tested with respect to authorization and approval of revenue invoices.

–  Not all donated goods and services had available backup documentation regarding nature and estimated value.

–  Documentation was not available to substantiate management's oversight and review of the monthly financials for several months of the year.

According to the Auditors' Schedule: "There was no monetary impact to the exceptions noted as the auditor was able to get comfortable that the transactions did exist and were related to the location to which they were recorded. Such information used by the auditor included: a) the supporting payroll registers; b) invoice and check/payment support; and c) grant invoice." In response, CORE's management cited several measures it has taken to prevent such issues in the future, such as "hiring a veteran payroll director to manage all aspects of payroll activities" and transitioning to a "replacement payroll system."

Regarding CORE's "Year-End Close Process," the Auditors' Schedule reports: "There were several adjustments recorded as a result of audit procedures, which may indicate certain month-end close processes are not working as designed. These adjustments included a reduction of expenses by approximately $200,000 for an invoice booked twice, reduction of revenue of approximately $200,000 for artwork sold that was booked twice, and an adjustment of approximately $450,000 to reconcile balances between the US and Haiti divisions and the related expenses." The auditors cited CORE's "surge in workforce capacity" and "turnover in management and accounting personnel during 2021" as having contributed to the cited issues.

The Auditors' Schedule reports that the effect of the above cited Year-End Close Process issues is: "Financial reporting may not be accurate." The auditors' recommendation is that CORE "implement additional closing procedures to ensure all necessary journal entries are recorded, accounts are reconciled, and management reviews monthly financial reporting." In response, CORE's management stated that "CORE's 2021 expenses increased to $105 million from $49 million in 2020," and that the two adjustment and reconciliation "oversights" cited by the auditors "represent less than 1% of the total expenditures for 2021."

The above information from the Auditors' Schedule represents only a sampling of the independent auditors' findings and the responses of CORE's management. A complete copy of CORE’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 is available on ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer website.

During a financial audit, auditors conduct various forms of sampling, which involves checking a portion of an organization's financial transactions to ensure that they are accurately recognized and recorded, that sufficient documentation exists to substantiate them, and that proper internal controls are being maintained by an organization's management. Samples are planned, selected, and evaluated for the purpose of providing an organization's auditors with statistically representative data adequate for inferring the overall accuracy of the reporting. An audit does not entail the auditors checking 100% of an organization's financial transactions to confirm the accuracy of the total of the reporting. For this reason, errors may exist in an organization's financial reporting that go undetected by its auditors.

Related External Articles